UK Government ~$120k grant for Architecture students' technical education!

BSEE - Building Services and Environmental Engineer: University improves practical skills

Read this carefully: this is documentation of a grant to the "Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture at Kingston University" to install a heliodon, an artifical sky and other 'advanced' equipment such as has been used by architecture and building science students at Victoria for the past 30 years.

The Director of the new 'ArchiLab' is quoted as saying: "The days in which architecture students focused predominantly on the visual impact of buildings were long gone, Dr Pretlove said. “They are now required to give just as much thought to the wider specifications of a site and the environmental factors that might affect a final design." What is unclear is how the lab is supposed to take these tools and transfer their use from the educational environment into practice. This is an aspect of the use of these tools that is troubling: if they are genuinely to be incorporated into design on a regular basis in the educational process, what happens when a student moves into a practice 1000km away? Are they to fly in for each project? And this is ignoring the fact that an artificial sky is a cloudy climate device, and does not deal well with the mixed / dynamic skies of most temperate countries...

What about new developments in architects' and lighting professionals' understanding of dynamic daylight modelling? Where might programs like Ecotect or Energy+ or ESP-r fit in this mix?