"Guns Germs and Steel" author Jared Diamond

Great title! The follow-up, Collapse is an even better read, but far less memorable title. Can't help thinking there are so many intuitive leaps with little supporting documentation that Diamond is a little like the 'von Daniken' of the noughties.

Still, a challenge is laid down to think and to react and form an opinion as to what to do/ how to react.

Most interesting part of the book? Again, not the mainstream ideas, but rather the process hinted at: Diamond thanks his graduate classes for their participation in reviewing the content of the book chapters. A way of combining teaching in a challenging manner with book writing?

A headline I couldn't resist: The Hippies Were Right! /

The Hippies Were Right! / Green homes? Organic food? Nature is good? Time to give the ol' tie-dyers some respect
The whole of the Bay Area is full of people who write and think like this. They still sell tie-dyed T-shirts and other clothing in the Saturday markets in Berkeley around Telegraph / Bancroft.

Scratch the surface of most of those comfortable homes in the quiet streets surrounding the University of California - Berkeley - and you will find people who have done quite well for themselves as hippies who grew up. They are still passionate about the whales / spiritual values / improving the planet neighbourhood by neighbourhood.

But, they have had the resources to do this. I keep wondering where the wealth has come from to make this happen. After all the Prius is (in my terms) a rich person's car. These quiet suburban homes cost a bomb in international terms. Of course, there are squillionaires who I am ignoring, and even more dangerous to the environment those people building 1200 sq m mansions by the thousand. But I am left wondering how we can learn from these lessons if they continue to cost as much to implement that only those hippies who live in the readership area of the San Francisco Chronicle can afford to do them well...

Still: love the ironic tone and writing style. This is what large populations do deliver: quality writing that is good to read.

Thom Mayne: Architecture is a new way to connect to the world

Given that Mayne is leading a firm that regularly uses GC to generate form / explore ideas; that gets involved with LBNL in projects that push the boundaries of what is possible from an environmental performance point of view; that has a 3D printer in-house for constructing models of staff ideas; and that has been adulated / emulated by architecture students in the past for the complexity of its hybrid drawings - it was interesting to see what was focused on here in a TED lecture: the drawings and the environmental performance somehow intertwined. Not quite what I had expected.

My only problem is that having visited the CalTrans building in LA, it seems very much in need of a few emperor's-new-clothes question or two. It is exciting and intersting when you knwo what the parts are supposed to do. However, it feels very much like a New Brutalism - as powerful in its ugliness as much modern classical music. Hard to see it being popular - in the sense of being liked by people who have to walk past it - cannot comment about the worker experience inside.

William McDonough: does Larry Lessig

Came across this entitled "The wisdom of designing Cradle to Cradle" whilst looking for other stuff - as you do. What struck me about this was the presentation approach. We have heard all this before over the last 30 years in one form or other.

What seems to be unique here (apart from the obvious - that WM is hugely successful in terms of the work his firm is doing) is the Powerpoint owes more than a little debt to a style I blogged about earlier this year. It is a style of presentation used by Dick Hardt in his Identity 2.0 presentation but named after Larry Lessig - the internet copyright guru.

lecture topic - May 23 2007 - Rendering issues and ideas

Today Justin presented his Light Flow meter research with a request that one of your Light Studio renders is run with the light flow meter (see above from Kit Cuttle's book on Lighting) inserted into the picture taking up 30% of the view... AND the RTRACE render commands are followed to calculate the light intensity on each of 6 cardinal points of the white sphere.

Educational Curriculum in CAD - why is it the teaching materials have to be boring?

Scanning quickly through the new curriculum workbook for Revit to ascertain how it might replace our now creaky, because five years old, Villa Savoye tutorial I can see that the workbook is comprehensive.

That my students might want to dip into it to find out particular things I have no doubt. That I would / should subject them to the whole thing - no way.





Reviewing the "Harrison Fraker video" about BIM it seems to me that there is some confusion encouraged by that video to see BIM as somehow computational geometries. In addition whilst my students would find the ideas in that video of interest they would immediately notice the great gap between the hype of the video and the mundane reality of the worksheet:











Students in my experience like to be challenged. They like to work on stuff that is interesting and real and pushes boundaries. We had success years ago now with the Villa Savoye as a basis for an introductory tutorial because it was interesting challenging and real .

I still use it as a two x 2 hour tutorial session with homework in a modelling course that experience shows works well. But I believe it needs updating and extending into construction more than we can do in the one course. I hoped at first glance that this might be the case with the workbook - but no.

What I really want is a structured set of exercises where I am sketching in sketchup - say - Falling Water.

Then I am importing it and modelling it properly.

Then I am exporting it to Viz and rendering it and walking through it and creating interactive views (dwf / QTVR mov / 3D pdf)

Finally, I am going back into revit and building drawing documentation - construction details showing on the sheet rendered views of what it looks like alongside sections of how it is constructed and then exporting the whole to a set of pdf's that include 3D interactive views.

Falling Water this year; Guggenheim New York in the future; Guggenheim Bilbao in the future?

Death by Architecture - Architecture Competitions

Death by Architecture
How specialist can you get? This site focuses on publicising architectural competitions. Sort by deadlines - type of participant - region etc. Find (at present) claims for 'First Design Competition for Second Architecture' - yet another take on using second life. Interesting but ultimately as with much of SL - vaguely ho-hum.

This web site really ought to have an RSS feed. Who wants to browse it every second day? What I want is to enter some search terms and be kept up-to-date... Apart from this easily fixed problem - a useful source/site.